See Honeycutt v. Dillard’s, Inc., 989 F. Supp. 1375, 1377 (D.Kan.1997). Defendants couldn’t provide any fundamental truth, numbers or data supporting this statement. The undersigned has not yet regarded as this belated “economic research” as it is not inside the removing see or presented through *1201 attached affidavit thereto. See Laughlin, 50 F.3d at 873; Martin, 251 F.3d at 1291 letter. 4; Coca Cola Bottling of Emporia, Inc. v. Southern coastline refreshment Co., Inc., 198 F. Supp. 2d 1280, 1283 (D.Kan.2002) ( “[B]ecause jurisdiction is set in the course of the observe of treatment, the movant must fulfill their stress inside find of removal, maybe not in some future pleading.”).
No matter if defendants had posted the proper and timely affidavit supporting the “economic comparison” regarding expenses of injunctive therapy, such wouldn’t normally offer the the proper analysis of cure needed. Defendants deal the judge can count on either the cost of injunctive cure to defendants and/or worth of injunctive cure to plaintiffs to look for the levels in debate, mentioning Justice v.